home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
TIME: Almanac 1995
/
TIME Almanac 1995.iso
/
time
/
081291
/
0812105.000
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1995-02-26
|
4KB
|
82 lines
<text id=91TT1777>
<title>
Aug. 12, 1991: The Last Media Circus
</title>
<history>
TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1991
Aug. 12, 1991 Busybodies & Crybabies
</history>
<article>
<source>Time Magazine</source>
<hdr>
NATION, Page 26
The Last Media Circus
</hdr><body>
<p> If last week's summit between George Bush and Mikhail
Gorbachev symbolized the end of the cold war, it may also have
marked the end of a rather less historic phenomenon: the Great
International Media Circus, with its Tibet-size press rooms
wired for every conceivable form of human communication; "photo
ops" in which a couple of dozen photographers viciously compete
to see who can take the same picture the most times; legions of
bored, humiliated reporters wandering aimlessly about with the
glazed eyes of the living dead; and assorted bearers, runners
and factotums, each armed with a walkie-talkie in order to
remain, Sununu-like, in a state of "constant communication"
("Base to Smith, Bush is moving, Bush is moving!"). Last week's
summit had all this, plus near riots in the press room whenever
White House aides distributed another meaningless pool report
(sample title: "Mrs. Bush Pool Report #A").
</p>
<p> Why is the circus folding its tent? Economics. Pan
American World Airways, from which the White House charters the
press plane, is under bankruptcy proceedings and is in the
process of selling its assets. If Pan Am goes under, no other
airline appears both willing and able to replace it as the
official purveyor of 747s to the press corps. "No other airline
wants to do it," says Gary Wright of the White House Travel
Office. "The bottom line is the airlines don't make enough money
out of it, and the p.r. value is negligible."
</p>
<p> Then there are the financial realities of modern
journalism. Monstrous as the Moscow extravaganza was--the TV
networks couldn't resist sending their anchors, and CBS
dispatched seven camera crews--many news executives have
concluded that they can no longer afford saturation coverage of
all presidential trips. (The overall cost of just the press
centers in Moscow and Kiev was $250,000.) The Associated Press
sent 11 staff members on the trip, a third less than the number
that covered the Reagan-Gorbachev summit in 1988.
</p>
<p> Since the coldest days of the cold war, summit coverage
has been a growth industry. But it has ballooned to such
mammoth proportions that it has crossed into the realm of
self-parody. Only a relative handful of the 2,113 journalists
accredited to cover the Bush-Gorbachev meetings managed to lay
eyes on any of the leaders' key aides, much less Bush or
Gorbachev. Some White House regulars were assigned to pools, but
most journalists "covered" the events by sitting in the press
room at Mezhdunarodnaya Hotel, a mile and a half from the
Kremlin. There they read pool reports, watched CNN on projection
TV screens, spoke mainly to one another and were given a single
diplobabble briefing by the two press spokesmen, Marlin
Fitzwater and Vitali Ignatenko.
</p>
<p> The absurdity of all this was highlighted Tuesday night
when a White House aide announced that the pool assigned to
cover Bush's visit to Gorbachev's suburban residence was not
expected to provide any coverage. "You'll just go up there and
hang out," the aide advised.
</p>
<p> Observed a Moscow-based correspondent: "Coverage like this
has become a giant fraud--everybody pretending and writing as
if they actually saw something. It's really just
institutionalized plagiarism."
</p>
<p> By Stanley W. Cloud
</p>
</body></article>
</text>